| | | | | | |

Core i3-3110M vs A9 9420


Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.3 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
670f00
Core
Ivy Bridge
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
46.33k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
8.41k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
11.48k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
3.29k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.24k (x0.86)
TOTAL
18.83k
25.41k (x1.35)

Multithread

i3-3110M

9420
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
11.25k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
13.69k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
2.09k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
1.87k (x0.83)
TOTAL
37.78k
28.89k (x0.76)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
7.55k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
13.9k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
3.11k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
2.18k (x1.04)
TOTAL
17.03k
26.74k (x1.57)

Multithread

i3-3110M

9420
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
9.09k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
12.25k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
3k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
1.81k (x0.74)
TOTAL
33.81k
26.15k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i3-3110M
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
817 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
1743 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
2096 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
3862 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
864 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
604 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
7427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4