Core i3-3110M vs A6 7310
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 7310 is based on Puma.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
730f01
Core
Ivy Bridge
Carrizo-L
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
FP4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
June 2012
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
11.17k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
35.87k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
4.08k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
3.76k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
2.21k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
1.12k (x0.54)
TOTAL
17.03k
11.17k (x0.66)
Multithread
i3-3110M
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
13.38k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
13.51k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
7.39k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
1.59k (x0.65)
TOTAL
33.81k
35.87k (x1.06)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
540 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
296 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
1435 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
1700 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
1566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
921 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
467 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
4654 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4