| | | | | | |

Core i3-3110M vs A4 5000


Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 5000 is based on Jaguar.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the 5000 gets 24.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.4 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
700f01
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kabini
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Socket FT3
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
June 2012
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
7.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
24.71k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
2.58k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
2.43k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
1.39k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
0.98k (x0.47)
TOTAL
17.03k
7.38k (x0.43)

Multithread

i3-3110M

5000
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
9.55k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
8.66k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.06k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
1.45k (x0.6)
TOTAL
33.81k
24.71k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i3-3110M
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
637 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
577 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
337 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
1647 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
1721 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
1620 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
650 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4