| | | | | | |

Core i3-2330M vs i7-6820HQ


Description
The i3-2330M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2330M gets a score of 33.3 k points while the i7-6820HQ gets 159.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 4.8 times faster than the i3-2330M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
506e3
Core
Sandy Bridge
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2011
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.02k points
50.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.28k points
205.89k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2330M
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5.61k
11.78k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
5.42k
18.06k (x3.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.45k
4.48k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
7.12k (x2.81)
TOTAL
16.02k
41.44k (x2.59)

Multithread

i3-2330M

i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
11.99k
49.46k (x4.13)
Test#2 (FP)
11.42k
84.8k (x7.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
20.7k (x3.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
4.77k (x1.17)
TOTAL
33.28k
159.73k (x4.8)

Performance/W
i3-2330M
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
343 points/W
1099 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
326 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
460 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
951 points/W
3550 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-2330M
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2551 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2465 points/GHz
5016 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
1977 points/GHz
TOTAL
7281 points/GHz
11510 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4