| | | | | | |

Core i3-2330M vs i3-6100T


Description
The i3-2330M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2330M gets a score of 33.3 k points while the i3-6100T gets 79.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2.4 times faster than the i3-2330M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
506e3
Core
Sandy Bridge
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2011
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.02k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.28k points
105.21k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2330M
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.61k
10.46k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
5.42k
17.55k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.45k
3.71k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
3.07k (x1.21)
TOTAL
16.02k
34.79k (x2.17)

Multithread

i3-2330M

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.99k
23.92k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
11.42k
42.11k (x3.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
10.51k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
2.57k (x0.63)
TOTAL
33.28k
79.1k (x2.38)

Performance/W
i3-2330M
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
343 points/W
683 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
326 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
300 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
951 points/W
2260 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-2330M
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2551 points/GHz
3268 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2465 points/GHz
5485 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
TOTAL
7281 points/GHz
10872 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4