Core i3-2120 vs FX 8350
Description
The i3-2120 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2120 gets a score of 53.5 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.2 times faster than the i3-2120 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2120 gets a score of 53.5 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.2 times faster than the i3-2120 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
600f20
Core
Sandy Bridge
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2012
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
24.23k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
53.48k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2120
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
9.07k
9.85k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
8.25k
8.41k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.58k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
6.32k (x2.16)
TOTAL
24.23k
28.16k (x1.16)
Multithread
i3-2120
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
20.86k
44.93k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
19.51k
45.21k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.09k
22.81k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
5.19k (x1.71)
TOTAL
53.48k
118.14k (x2.21)
Performance/W
i3-2120
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
300 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
155 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
823 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-2120
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
2748 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
886 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
7343 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4