Core i3-2100 vs i5-10400T
Description
The i3-2100 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 5.9 times faster than the i3-2100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 5.9 times faster than the i3-2100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2011
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
19.52k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.1k points
307.18k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2100
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
12.5k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
7.16k
19.05k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.62k
4.72k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
10.3k (x3.85)
TOTAL
19.52k
46.57k (x2.39)
Multithread
i3-2100
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.19k
74.58k (x5.25)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
126.96k (x8.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.26k
31.76k (x4.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
2.5k (x0.72)
TOTAL
40.1k
235.8k (x5.88)
Performance/W
i3-2100
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
218 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
234 points/W
3627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112 points/W
907 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
617 points/W
6737 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-2100
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2279 points/GHz
3472 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2311 points/GHz
5292 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
845 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
862 points/GHz
2860 points/GHz
TOTAL
6297 points/GHz
12936 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4