Core i3-2100 vs i3-6006U
Description
The i3-2100 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the i3-6006U gets 49.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-2100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the i3-6006U gets 49.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-2100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
406e3
Core
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2011
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
19.52k points
31.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.1k points
68.38k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2100
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
7.34k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
7.16k
11.37k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.62k
2.74k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
3.08k (x1.15)
TOTAL
19.52k
24.53k (x1.26)
Multithread
i3-2100
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.19k
15.32k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
25.61k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.26k
6.36k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
2.58k (x0.75)
TOTAL
40.1k
49.87k (x1.24)
Performance/W
i3-2100
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
218 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
234 points/W
1707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112 points/W
424 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
617 points/W
3325 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-2100
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2279 points/GHz
3670 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2311 points/GHz
5683 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
845 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
862 points/GHz
1540 points/GHz
TOTAL
6297 points/GHz
12265 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4