Core i3-2100 vs i3-4030U
Description
The i3-2100 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the i3-4030U gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-2100 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2100 gets a score of 40.1 k points while the i3-4030U gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-2100 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
40651
Core
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2011
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
19.52k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.1k points
46.09k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2100
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
6.4k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
7.16k
6.2k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.62k
2.5k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
2.05k (x0.77)
TOTAL
19.52k
17.15k (x0.88)
Multithread
i3-2100
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.19k
12.86k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
15.19k
15.12k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.26k
5.76k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
2.15k (x0.62)
TOTAL
40.1k
35.88k (x0.89)
Performance/W
i3-2100
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
218 points/W
857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
234 points/W
1008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112 points/W
384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
143 points/W
TOTAL
617 points/W
2392 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-2100
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
2279 points/GHz
3366 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2311 points/GHz
3263 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
845 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
862 points/GHz
1078 points/GHz
TOTAL
6297 points/GHz
9024 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4