Core i3-10110U vs Xeon W3520
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.1 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.1 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
106a5
Core
Comet Lake-U
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
7.35k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
4.89k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
2.9k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
2.82k (x0.66)
TOTAL
43.87k
17.96k (x0.41)
Multithread
i3-10110U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
29.69k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
22.26k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
14.91k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
6.29k (x1.96)
TOTAL
80.85k
73.16k (x0.9)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2755 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
5390 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4901 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
10699 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4