| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Xeon E5645


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.1 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
206c2
Core
Comet Lake-U
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /6
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
76.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
1.78k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
3.91k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
2.52k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.42k (x0.56)
TOTAL
28.98k
10.64k (x0.37)

Multithread

i3-10110U

E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
9.67k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
22.92k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
14.31k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
3.81k (x1.16)
TOTAL
50.13k
50.7k (x1.01)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
6.47k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
4.4k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
2.43k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
2.33k (x0.55)
TOTAL
43.87k
15.64k (x0.36)

Multithread

i3-10110U

E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
34.43k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
24.23k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
14.48k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
3.81k (x1.19)
TOTAL
80.85k
76.96k (x0.95)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/W
430 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2755 points/W
303 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
181 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
5390 points/W
962 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4901 points/GHz
1573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
867 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
833 points/GHz
TOTAL
10699 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4