| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.45k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
9.96k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
4.26k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.27k (x0.99)
TOTAL
28.98k
21.94k (x0.76)

Multithread

i3-10110U

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
14.01k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
37.68k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
17.05k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
7.35k (x2.24)
TOTAL
50.13k
76.09k (x1.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
19.17k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
10.55k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.79k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
4.65k (x0.99)
TOTAL
56.64k
39.16k (x0.69)

Multithread

i3-10110U

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
73.13k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
42.06k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
18.03k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
7.54k (x1.9)
TOTAL
106.58k
140.76k (x1.32)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4