| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
50657
Core
Comet Lake-U
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2019
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
1.97k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
8.15k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
2.37k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.84k (x1.12)
TOTAL
28.98k
17.32k (x0.6)

Multithread

i3-10110U

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
15.73k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
64.78k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
18.06k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
5.21k (x1.59)
TOTAL
50.13k
103.77k (x2.07)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
12.92k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
10.97k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
2.54k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
5.09k (x1.08)
TOTAL
56.64k
31.52k (x0.56)

Multithread

i3-10110U

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
103.33k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
87.67k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
20.1k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.91k (x1.23)
TOTAL
106.58k
216.02k (x2.03)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4