| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Pentium G4560


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.

Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
906e9
Core
Comet Lake-U
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
89.91k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.01k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
18.74k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
5.06k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
7.4k (x1.74)
TOTAL
43.87k
44.21k (x1.01)

Multithread

i3-10110U

G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
27.22k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
43.79k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
11.74k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
7.16k (x2.23)
TOTAL
80.85k
89.91k (x1.11)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2755 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
5390 points/W
1665 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4901 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
10699 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4