Core i3-10110U vs i9-10980XE
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 11.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 11.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
50657
Core
Comet Lake-U
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
2/4
18/36
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
1241.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.52k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
17.94k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.5k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
9.64k (x2.24)
TOTAL
28.98k
37.6k (x1.3)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
84.93k (x11.46)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
409.55k (x14.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
122.88k (x11.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
22.12k (x6.75)
TOTAL
50.13k
639.48k (x12.76)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
16.03k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
23.95k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
6.03k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
9.37k (x2.21)
TOTAL
43.87k
55.38k (x1.26)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
316.11k (x12.39)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
503.75k (x12.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
131.82k (x12.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
22.24k (x6.92)
TOTAL
80.85k
973.92k (x12.05)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
16.4k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
20.97k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.82k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
8.86k (x2.08)
TOTAL
45.22k
52.05k (x1.15)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
316.84k (x12.12)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
461.09k (x10.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
129.82k (x12.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
22.09k (x6.74)
TOTAL
84.17k
929.85k (x11.05)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
29.53k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
22.59k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.99k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
10.22k (x2.18)
TOTAL
56.64k
68.33k (x1.21)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
587.06k (x12.23)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
496.41k (x11.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
134.66k (x13.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
22.99k (x5.78)
TOTAL
106.58k
1241.12k (x11.65)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4