| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i9-10900X


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 5.9 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
50657
Core
Comet Lake-U
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
2/4
10/20
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
19712 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
632.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
25.97k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
22.37k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.3k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
8.63k (x1.84)
TOTAL
56.64k
62.28k (x1.1)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
281.98k (x5.88)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
259.01k (x5.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
64.87k (x6.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
26.5k (x6.66)
TOTAL
106.58k
632.35k (x5.93)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
3832 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4