| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i7-9750H


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 2.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
276.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.53k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
18.24k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.76k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
13.01k (x3.02)
TOTAL
28.98k
41.54k (x1.43)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
24.3k (x3.28)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
97.88k (x3.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
29.85k (x2.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
11.93k (x3.64)
TOTAL
50.13k
163.95k (x3.27)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
16.32k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
23.42k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
6.04k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
13.24k (x3.12)
TOTAL
43.87k
59.03k (x1.35)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
86.92k (x3.41)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
126.14k (x3.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
29.62k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
11.86k (x3.69)
TOTAL
80.85k
254.54k (x3.15)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
16.31k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
24.48k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.87k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
13.02k (x3.06)
TOTAL
45.22k
59.67k (x1.32)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
87.54k (x3.35)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
131.05k (x2.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
28.47k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
11.8k (x3.6)
TOTAL
84.17k
258.87k (x3.08)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
25.22k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
21.97k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.02k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
10.71k (x2.28)
TOTAL
56.64k
62.92k (x1.11)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
125.56k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
115.86k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
25.63k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
9.4k (x2.36)
TOTAL
106.58k
276.46k (x2.59)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4