| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i7-9750H


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 2.7 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
65.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
286.43k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
25.93k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
22.84k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.11k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
11.46k (x2.44)
TOTAL
56.64k
65.33k (x1.15)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
130.68k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
119.91k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
28.76k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
7.08k (x1.78)
TOTAL
106.58k
286.43k (x2.69)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
2904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
639 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
6365 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
14519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4