| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i7-6700


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-6700 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i7-6700 gets 243.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6700 is 2.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
57.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
243.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
24.83k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
21.82k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.98k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
6.14k (x1.31)
TOTAL
56.64k
57.76k (x1.02)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
109.79k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
102.39k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
24.72k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
6.51k (x1.64)
TOTAL
106.58k
243.4k (x2.28)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1689 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
3745 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6206 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5456 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
14441 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4