| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i7-4765T


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4765T is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4765T is 1.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
134.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
15.61k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
8.8k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
3.58k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
3.33k (x0.71)
TOTAL
56.64k
31.31k (x0.55)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
66k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
43.27k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
17.39k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
7.88k (x1.98)
TOTAL
106.58k
134.53k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1886 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1236 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
497 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
3844 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5203 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
2932 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1110 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
10438 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4