Core i3-10110U vs i7-4710HQ
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i7-4710HQ gets 155.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i7-4710HQ gets 155.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4710HQ is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
15 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
40.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
155.24k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
20.98k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
10.48k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.75k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
4.44k (x0.95)
TOTAL
56.64k
40.65k (x0.72)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
77.73k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
52.12k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
20.55k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.85k (x1.22)
TOTAL
106.58k
155.24k (x1.46)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
3303 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
2993 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
11614 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4