Core i3-10110U vs i7-2600
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-2600 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the i7-2600 gets 93.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-2600 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the i7-2600 gets 93.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-2600 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
206a7
Core
Comet Lake-U
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
28.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
93.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
10.03k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
8.91k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
4.34k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
5.41k (x1.27)
TOTAL
45.22k
28.68k (x0.63)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
37.69k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
34.22k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
17.65k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
4.13k (x1.26)
TOTAL
84.17k
93.69k (x1.11)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1743 points/W
397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
360 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
186 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
218 points/W
43 points/W
TOTAL
5611 points/W
986 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i7-2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3476 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5256 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1039 points/GHz
1425 points/GHz
TOTAL
11029 points/GHz
7549 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4