| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i5-9500T


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 2.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
274.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.73k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
15.41k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
4.62k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
10.59k (x2.46)
TOTAL
28.98k
34.35k (x1.19)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
20.82k (x2.81)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
85.48k (x2.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
23.21k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
4.11k (x1.26)
TOTAL
50.13k
133.63k (x2.67)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
12.4k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
18.41k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
4.69k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
10.48k (x2.47)
TOTAL
43.87k
45.98k (x1.05)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
74.86k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
105.88k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
22.34k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
4.01k (x1.25)
TOTAL
80.85k
207.08k (x2.56)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
13.46k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
20.21k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
4.72k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
10.25k (x2.41)
TOTAL
45.22k
48.64k (x1.08)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
74.65k (x2.85)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
110.86k (x2.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
22.08k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
4.12k (x1.26)
TOTAL
84.17k
211.7k (x2.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
24.5k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
21.41k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.82k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
10.73k (x2.29)
TOTAL
56.64k
61.46k (x1.08)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
134.63k (x2.81)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
113.61k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
21.71k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.07k (x1.02)
TOTAL
106.58k
274.02k (x2.57)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
7829 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4