Core i3-10110U vs i5-9300H
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-9300H gets 188 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.8 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-9300H gets 188 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.8 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
61.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
187.98k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
24.7k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
21.5k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.87k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
9.99k (x2.13)
TOTAL
56.64k
61.06k (x1.08)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
85.56k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
76.43k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
19.35k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
6.63k (x1.67)
TOTAL
106.58k
187.98k (x1.76)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1698 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
430 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
147 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
4177 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6023 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5245 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2437 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
14893 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4