| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i5-7300U


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-7300U gets 109.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
806e9
Core
Comet Lake-U
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
109.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.11k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
12.24k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
4.1k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.96k (x1.15)
TOTAL
28.98k
24.41k (x0.84)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
6.98k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
32.05k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
10.82k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
5.52k (x1.68)
TOTAL
50.13k
55.36k (x1.1)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
9.96k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
15.11k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
3.87k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.54k (x1.07)
TOTAL
43.87k
33.47k (x0.76)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
25.26k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
40.6k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
11.24k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
5.83k (x1.82)
TOTAL
80.85k
82.94k (x1.03)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
9.85k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
17.37k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
3.98k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
5.11k (x1.2)
TOTAL
45.22k
36.31k (x0.8)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
25.37k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
43.43k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
10.62k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
5.4k (x1.65)
TOTAL
84.17k
84.82k (x1.01)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
20.18k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
18.57k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.24k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
5.25k (x1.12)
TOTAL
56.64k
48.25k (x0.85)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
47.75k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
44.82k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
10.82k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
5.7k (x1.43)
TOTAL
106.58k
109.1k (x1.02)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
3184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
380 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
7273 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5766 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5306 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1501 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
13785 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4