| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i5-5675R


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.8 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
40671
Core
Comet Lake-U
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.14k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
14.35k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
4.94k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
5.47k (x1.27)
TOTAL
28.98k
28.91k (x1)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
16.02k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
54.6k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
18.69k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
16.87k (x5.15)
TOTAL
50.13k
106.18k (x2.12)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
12.86k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
16.85k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
5.19k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
5.49k (x1.29)
TOTAL
43.87k
40.39k (x0.92)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
50.07k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
64.61k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
19.84k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
17.09k (x5.32)
TOTAL
80.85k
151.6k (x1.88)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
12.88k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
18.27k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.12k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
5.45k (x1.28)
TOTAL
45.22k
41.72k (x0.92)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
49.91k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
70.3k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
19.69k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
16.92k (x5.17)
TOTAL
84.17k
156.83k (x1.86)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
21.91k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
18.59k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.2k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
5.72k (x1.22)
TOTAL
56.64k
51.43k (x0.91)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
84.92k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
72.09k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
20.13k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
17.07k (x4.29)
TOTAL
106.58k
194.2k (x1.82)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4