Core i3-10110U vs i5-3340M
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306a9
Core
Comet Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
62.75k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
11.51k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
11.13k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
4.4k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
4.55k (x1.07)
TOTAL
45.22k
31.58k (x0.7)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
22.59k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
25.49k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
10.42k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
4.25k (x1.3)
TOTAL
84.17k
62.75k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
1743 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
218 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5611 points/W
1793 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3476 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5256 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1039 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
11029 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4