| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i5-2400


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the i5-2400 gets 84.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
206a7
Core
Comet Lake-U
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
25.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
84.36k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
2.72k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
7.6k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
3.98k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.47k (x1.04)
TOTAL
28.98k
18.78k (x0.65)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
10.37k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
28.84k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
15.08k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
4.67k (x1.43)
TOTAL
50.13k
58.95k (x1.18)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
9.16k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
8.2k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
3.95k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
4.17k (x0.98)
TOTAL
45.22k
25.49k (x0.56)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
34.74k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
31.07k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
14.86k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
3.69k (x1.13)
TOTAL
84.17k
84.36k (x1)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
1743 points/W
366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
327 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
218 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
5611 points/W
888 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
3476 points/GHz
2695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5256 points/GHz
2411 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1039 points/GHz
1228 points/GHz
TOTAL
11029 points/GHz
7497 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4