Core i3-10110U vs i5-2320
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the i5-2320 gets 66.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the i5-2320 gets 66.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
206a7
Core
Comet Lake-U
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
66.48k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
8.88k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
7.84k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
3.79k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
3.51k (x0.82)
TOTAL
45.22k
24.01k (x0.53)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
27.98k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
24.48k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
11.42k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
2.6k (x0.79)
TOTAL
84.17k
66.48k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
1743 points/W
295 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
258 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
218 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
5611 points/W
700 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
3476 points/GHz
2689 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5256 points/GHz
2375 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1039 points/GHz
1063 points/GHz
TOTAL
11029 points/GHz
7277 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4