Core i3-10110U vs i5-10400T
Description
Both models i3-10110U and i5-10400T are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.9 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.9 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
14.19k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
4.62k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
11.03k (x2.56)
TOTAL
28.98k
33.84k (x1.17)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
22.77k (x3.07)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
96.59k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
31.65k (x3.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
2.45k (x0.75)
TOTAL
50.13k
153.46k (x3.06)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
12.61k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
17.94k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
4.83k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
10.81k (x2.55)
TOTAL
43.87k
46.19k (x1.05)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
74.62k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
119.63k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
32.65k (x3.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
2.52k (x0.78)
TOTAL
80.85k
229.42k (x2.84)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
12.5k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
19.05k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
4.72k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
10.3k (x2.42)
TOTAL
45.22k
46.57k (x1.03)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
74.58k (x2.85)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
126.96k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
31.76k (x2.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
2.5k (x0.76)
TOTAL
84.17k
235.8k (x2.8)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
22k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
19.98k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.57k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
11.31k (x2.41)
TOTAL
56.64k
57.85k (x1.02)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
136.69k (x2.85)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
135.25k (x3.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
32.76k (x3.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
2.48k (x0.62)
TOTAL
106.58k
307.18k (x2.88)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4