| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i5-10300H


Description
Both models i3-10110U and i5-10300H are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 2.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
a0652
Core
Comet Lake-U
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
15.65k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
23.13k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.66k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
11.43k (x2.68)
TOTAL
45.22k
55.87k (x1.24)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
26.77k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
43.81k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
10.17k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
11.91k (x3.64)
TOTAL
84.17k
92.66k (x1.1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
27.14k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
24.75k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.73k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
11.84k (x2.52)
TOTAL
56.64k
69.47k (x1.23)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
105.77k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
107.47k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
24.82k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
8.02k (x2.02)
TOTAL
106.58k
246.07k (x2.31)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4