| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i3-9100T


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.8 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
906eb
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
192.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.79k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
15.65k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
4.59k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
7.78k (x1.81)
TOTAL
28.98k
31.81k (x1.1)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
13.97k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
57.83k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
17.03k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
4.35k (x1.33)
TOTAL
50.13k
93.18k (x1.86)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.74k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
19.7k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
4.86k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
8.61k (x2.03)
TOTAL
43.87k
46.91k (x1.07)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
50.5k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
72.58k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
18.09k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
4.28k (x1.33)
TOTAL
80.85k
145.45k (x1.8)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
13.6k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
20.58k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
4.76k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
8.8k (x2.06)
TOTAL
45.22k
47.74k (x1.06)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
50.18k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
75.99k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
17.66k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
4.12k (x1.26)
TOTAL
84.17k
147.95k (x1.76)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
24.89k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
21.82k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.83k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
8.63k (x1.84)
TOTAL
56.64k
60.16k (x1.06)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
89.4k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
81.19k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
18.06k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.24k (x1.07)
TOTAL
106.58k
192.88k (x1.81)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4