Core i3-10110U vs i3-9100
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906eb
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
229.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.3k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
17.79k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.58k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
8.86k (x2.06)
TOTAL
28.98k
36.53k (x1.26)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
15.99k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
66.31k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
20.75k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
4.44k (x1.36)
TOTAL
50.13k
107.49k (x2.14)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
15.53k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
22.21k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
5.79k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
8.31k (x1.96)
TOTAL
43.87k
51.84k (x1.18)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
58.56k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
86.17k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
22.4k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
4.55k (x1.42)
TOTAL
80.85k
171.69k (x2.12)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
14.81k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
22.15k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.42k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
4.8k (x1.13)
TOTAL
45.22k
47.17k (x1.04)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
52.08k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
87.45k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
20.98k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
4.24k (x1.29)
TOTAL
84.17k
164.75k (x1.96)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
28.03k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
24.5k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.73k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
8.48k (x1.8)
TOTAL
56.64k
66.74k (x1.18)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
107.5k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
95.11k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
22.02k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.57k (x1.15)
TOTAL
106.58k
229.2k (x2.15)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
3526 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6675 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5833 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2018 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
15891 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4