| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i3-6100T


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i3-6100T gets 105.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
105.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.14k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
12.26k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
3.94k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.21k (x0.51)
TOTAL
28.98k
21.55k (x0.74)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
6.52k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
30.61k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
10.59k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
2.77k (x0.85)
TOTAL
50.13k
50.49k (x1.01)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
10.46k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
17.55k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
3.71k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
3.07k (x0.72)
TOTAL
45.22k
34.79k (x0.77)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
23.92k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
42.11k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
10.51k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
2.57k (x0.78)
TOTAL
84.17k
79.1k (x0.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
19.58k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
16.97k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
3.91k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
3.47k (x0.74)
TOTAL
56.64k
43.92k (x0.78)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
47.02k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
44.41k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
9.93k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.85k (x0.97)
TOTAL
106.58k
105.21k (x0.99)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1344 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
284 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
3006 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6119 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5303 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
13726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4