Core i3-10110U vs i3-6100
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
112.28k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.81k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
15.65k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.14k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.28k (x0.99)
TOTAL
28.98k
28.89k (x1)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
7.75k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
37.33k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
12.13k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
3.56k (x1.09)
TOTAL
50.13k
60.77k (x1.21)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.76k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
19.96k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
5.44k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.4k (x1.04)
TOTAL
43.87k
43.55k (x0.99)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
28.99k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
45.75k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
12.72k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
3.68k (x1.15)
TOTAL
80.85k
91.14k (x1.13)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
13.78k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
21.21k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.2k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
3.73k (x0.88)
TOTAL
45.22k
43.92k (x0.97)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
29.02k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
49.55k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
12.3k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
3.28k (x1)
TOTAL
84.17k
94.15k (x1.12)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
22.89k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
21.04k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.9k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
4.01k (x0.85)
TOTAL
56.64k
52.84k (x0.93)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
50.05k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
47.13k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
11.38k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.72k (x0.93)
TOTAL
106.58k
112.28k (x1.05)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4