| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs i3-10100T


Description
Both models i3-10110U and i3-10100T are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
227.67k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.32k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
15.7k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.04k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
7.68k (x1.78)
TOTAL
28.98k
32.73k (x1.13)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
16.59k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
71.1k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
23.26k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
3.86k (x1.18)
TOTAL
50.13k
114.81k (x2.29)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.84k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
19.79k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
5.28k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
8.31k (x1.96)
TOTAL
43.87k
47.22k (x1.08)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
54.67k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
90.71k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
24.11k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
3.85k (x1.2)
TOTAL
80.85k
173.34k (x2.14)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
13.88k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
20.94k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.18k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
8.2k (x1.92)
TOTAL
45.22k
48.19k (x1.07)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
54.88k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
93.17k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
23.34k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
3.85k (x1.18)
TOTAL
84.17k
175.24k (x2.08)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
24.31k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
22.15k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.14k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
8.46k (x1.8)
TOTAL
56.64k
60.06k (x1.06)

Multithread

i3-10110U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
101.48k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
98.04k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
24.28k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.86k (x0.97)
TOTAL
106.58k
227.67k (x2.14)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4