| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Celeron N5095


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.

Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
906c0
Core
Comet Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
93.26k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
10.08k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
10.11k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
4.06k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
2.36k (x0.56)
TOTAL
43.87k
26.6k (x0.61)

Multithread

i3-10110U

N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
36.86k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
38.51k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
15.17k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
2.72k (x0.85)
TOTAL
80.85k
93.26k (x1.15)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2755 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
5390 points/W
6217 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4901 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
10699 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4