| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Celeron N4120


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.8 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
706a8
Core
Comet Lake-U
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
46.17k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
5.94k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
7.51k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
2.78k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
2.67k (x0.63)
TOTAL
43.87k
18.9k (x0.43)

Multithread

i3-10110U

N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
15.02k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
19.77k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
7.71k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
3.67k (x1.14)
TOTAL
80.85k
46.17k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2755 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
5390 points/W
7694 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4901 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
10699 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4