Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 6.4 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 6.4 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
687.5k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.39k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
16.99k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
7.74k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
24.57k (x5.71)
TOTAL
28.98k
53.69k (x1.85)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
48.45k (x6.54)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
230.81k (x7.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
122.82k (x11.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
54.73k (x16.71)
TOTAL
50.13k
456.8k (x9.11)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
16.59k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
24.55k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
8.55k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
26.28k (x6.19)
TOTAL
43.87k
75.97k (x1.73)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
181.33k (x7.11)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
261.01k (x6.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
126.62k (x11.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
66.64k (x20.74)
TOTAL
80.85k
635.6k (x7.86)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
16.16k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
23.75k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
9.32k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
23.17k (x5.44)
TOTAL
45.22k
72.4k (x1.6)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
174.73k (x6.68)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
275.63k (x6.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
125.65k (x11.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
44.17k (x13.48)
TOTAL
84.17k
620.18k (x7.37)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
16.85k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
26.03k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
9.54k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
22.55k (x4.8)
TOTAL
56.64k
74.97k (x1.32)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
229.41k (x4.78)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
292.81k (x6.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
128.48k (x12.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
36.8k (x9.26)
TOTAL
106.58k
687.5k (x6.45)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4