| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 4 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-U
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.31k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
17.51k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
10.53k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
23.57k (x5.47)
TOTAL
28.98k
55.92k (x1.93)

Multithread

i3-10110U

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
24.18k (x3.26)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
117.98k (x4.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
70.96k (x6.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
8.08k (x2.47)
TOTAL
50.13k
221.19k (x4.41)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
20.37k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
22.52k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
10.18k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
21.49k (x4.57)
TOTAL
56.64k
74.56k (x1.32)

Multithread

i3-10110U

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
144.01k (x3)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
191.86k (x4.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
84.53k (x8.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
6.5k (x1.63)
TOTAL
106.58k
426.9k (x4.01)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4