Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 4.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 4.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
433.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.25k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
19.72k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.84k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
21.36k (x4.96)
TOTAL
28.98k
51.17k (x1.77)
Multithread
i3-10110U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
35.04k (x4.73)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
181.42k (x6.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
64.86k (x6.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
8.21k (x2.51)
TOTAL
50.13k
289.54k (x5.78)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
15.22k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
24.12k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
5.87k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
21k (x4.95)
TOTAL
43.87k
66.21k (x1.51)
Multithread
i3-10110U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
126.81k (x4.97)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
229.86k (x5.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
61.74k (x5.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
9.77k (x3.04)
TOTAL
80.85k
428.19k (x5.3)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
14.44k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
24.92k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.8k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
19.07k (x4.48)
TOTAL
45.22k
64.24k (x1.42)
Multithread
i3-10110U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
122.01k (x4.67)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
220.34k (x5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
59.89k (x5.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
9.9k (x3.02)
TOTAL
84.17k
412.13k (x4.9)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
15.61k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
26.08k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.84k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
18.34k (x3.91)
TOTAL
56.64k
65.87k (x1.16)
Multithread
i3-10110U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
123.33k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
240.46k (x5.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
61.23k (x5.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
8.17k (x2.05)
TOTAL
106.58k
433.19k (x4.06)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
4126 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4