Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 5 5600G
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600G is 3.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600G is 3.2 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-U
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
345.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
22.16k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
24.46k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
10.71k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
22.44k (x4.78)
TOTAL
56.64k
79.76k (x1.41)
Multithread
i3-10110U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
112.5k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
153.92k (x3.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
67.75k (x6.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
11.47k (x2.89)
TOTAL
106.58k
345.64k (x3.24)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4