Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 3.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 3.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.2k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
17.36k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
7.5k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
23.79k (x5.53)
TOTAL
28.98k
52.85k (x1.82)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
22.11k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
108.04k (x3.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
56.81k (x5.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
36.39k (x11.11)
TOTAL
50.13k
223.36k (x4.46)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
15.38k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
21.94k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
7.97k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
24.76k (x5.83)
TOTAL
43.87k
70.05k (x1.6)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
96.91k (x3.8)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
135.12k (x3.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
70.39k (x6.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
56.43k (x17.57)
TOTAL
80.85k
358.85k (x4.44)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
15.04k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
20.95k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
8.57k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
21.71k (x5.09)
TOTAL
45.22k
66.27k (x1.47)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
94.36k (x3.61)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
141.73k (x3.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
69.38k (x6.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
32.72k (x9.99)
TOTAL
84.17k
338.19k (x4.02)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
16.04k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
24.47k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
8.38k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
21.66k (x4.61)
TOTAL
56.64k
70.55k (x1.25)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
113.63k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
143.55k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
63.84k (x6.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
27.34k (x6.88)
TOTAL
106.58k
348.35k (x3.27)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4