| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 2.7 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
292.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.41k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
15.96k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
4.69k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
17.42k (x4.04)
TOTAL
28.98k
41.47k (x1.43)

Multithread

i3-10110U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
20.88k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
110.37k (x3.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
39.25k (x3.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
6.66k (x2.03)
TOTAL
50.13k
177.16k (x3.53)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
13.83k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
23.16k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.15k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
15.18k (x3.23)
TOTAL
56.64k
57.33k (x1.01)

Multithread

i3-10110U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
83.44k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
161.53k (x3.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
40.62k (x3.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
6.72k (x1.69)
TOTAL
106.58k
292.31k (x2.74)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4