| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.8k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
17.38k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.17k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.16k (x0.73)
TOTAL
28.98k
29.52k (x1.02)

Multithread

i3-10110U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
15.28k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
76.44k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
27.48k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
3.02k (x0.92)
TOTAL
50.13k
122.2k (x2.44)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
13.95k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
20.7k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
5.33k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.03k (x0.71)
TOTAL
43.87k
43.01k (x0.98)

Multithread

i3-10110U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
58.56k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
92.95k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
28.55k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
2.98k (x0.93)
TOTAL
80.85k
183.04k (x2.26)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
13.04k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
22.35k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.37k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
3.4k (x0.8)
TOTAL
45.22k
44.15k (x0.98)

Multithread

i3-10110U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
56.49k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
100.74k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
28.21k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
3.04k (x0.93)
TOTAL
84.17k
188.49k (x2.24)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
14.2k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
23.23k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.35k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
5.18k (x1.1)
TOTAL
56.64k
47.96k (x0.85)

Multithread

i3-10110U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
58.24k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
105.72k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
28.73k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
5.59k (x1.41)
TOTAL
106.58k
198.27k (x1.86)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4