| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 3 3350U


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
144.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
13.25k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
21.67k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.79k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
3.98k (x0.85)
TOTAL
56.64k
43.7k (x0.77)

Multithread

i3-10110U

3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
46.47k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
78.38k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
16.69k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.3k (x0.83)
TOTAL
106.58k
144.84k (x1.36)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
9656 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4