Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
3.89k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
17.94k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.34k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
6.62k (x1.54)
TOTAL
28.98k
33.79k (x1.17)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
15.07k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
66.84k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
19.56k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
6.54k (x2)
TOTAL
50.13k
108.01k (x2.15)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
14.3k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
21.69k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
5.42k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
6.6k (x1.56)
TOTAL
43.87k
48k (x1.09)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
55.45k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
83.13k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
20.76k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
6.58k (x2.05)
TOTAL
80.85k
165.91k (x2.05)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
13.05k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
22.88k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.39k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
7.31k (x1.72)
TOTAL
45.22k
48.63k (x1.08)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
51.73k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
87.74k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
20.74k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
6.57k (x2.01)
TOTAL
84.17k
166.79k (x1.98)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
14.48k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
23.84k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.43k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
5.46k (x1.16)
TOTAL
56.64k
49.21k (x0.87)
Multithread
i3-10110U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
54.39k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
88.77k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
20.04k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
5.48k (x1.38)
TOTAL
106.58k
168.69k (x1.58)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4