| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
100fa0
Core
Comet Lake-U
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
1.98k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
4.57k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
2.57k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.51k (x0.82)
TOTAL
28.98k
12.64k (x0.44)

Multithread

i3-10110U

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
11.86k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
27.4k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
15.39k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
3.46k (x1.06)
TOTAL
50.13k
58.11k (x1.16)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
5.17k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
5.33k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
2.76k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.51k (x0.83)
TOTAL
43.87k
16.77k (x0.38)

Multithread

i3-10110U

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
29.82k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
30.79k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
15.88k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
3.69k (x1.15)
TOTAL
80.85k
80.19k (x0.99)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2755 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
5390 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4901 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
10699 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4