Core i3-10110U vs FX 8120
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 8120 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the 8120 gets 70.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.2 times faster than the 8120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 84.2 k points while the 8120 gets 70.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.2 times faster than the 8120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
600f12
Core
Comet Lake-U
Zambezi
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+8x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
23.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
70.78k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
9.31k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
6.85k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
2.77k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
4.58k (x1.07)
TOTAL
45.22k
23.5k (x0.52)
Multithread
i3-10110U
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
25.84k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
28.49k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
13.84k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
2.61k (x0.8)
TOTAL
84.17k
70.78k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
1743 points/W
207 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2935 points/W
228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
218 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
5611 points/W
566 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
8120
Test#1 (Integers)
3476 points/GHz
2327 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5256 points/GHz
1712 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/GHz
693 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1039 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
11029 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4