| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Athlon 3000G


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
95.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
13.02k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
20.56k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
4.81k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
5.43k (x1.16)
TOTAL
56.64k
43.82k (x0.77)

Multithread

i3-10110U

3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
27.29k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
49.37k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
13.57k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
5.61k (x1.41)
TOTAL
106.58k
95.84k (x0.9)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
2738 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4